HOW PATERNALISTIC LEADERSHIP ENHANCES PERFORMANCE? EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF AFFECTIVE WELLBEING

Authors

  • Muhammad Ilyas Khan National Defence University, Islamabad
  • Muhammad Zia-ur- Rehman Dept of Leadership and Management Studies,National Defence University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v3i3.267

Abstract

The focus of the article is to investigate the impact of paternalistic leadership performance of middle level managerial employees specifically of universities. For this purpose, we conducted cross sectional and correlational study on middle level managers of different universities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi region. The study population is comprised of 269 randomly selected respondents from different universities. Questionnaires include open ended and close ended questions.  That was developed based on existing literature regarding employee performance and Job-related Affective Wellbeing. Employees’ performance was measured on task performance and contextual performance. After analysis, results indicate that Paternalistic leadership maintains a significant relationship with employees’ performance and paternalistic leadership is also significantly related with job related affective wellbeing. Furthermore, correlation results show that all the three variables have positive and significant association with each other. It is evident that job related affective wellbeing does moderate the relationship amongst paternalistic leadership and employees’ performance. At the end the study provides specific gaps for future research.

Keywords: paternalistic leadership, employees’ performance, JAW, universities

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Ilyas Khan, National Defence University, Islamabad

    Research Scholar

  • Muhammad Zia-ur- Rehman, Dept of Leadership and Management Studies,National Defence University

    Associate Professor

     

     

Additional Files

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

[1]
“HOW PATERNALISTIC LEADERSHIP ENHANCES PERFORMANCE? EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF AFFECTIVE WELLBEING”, Pak. J, Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 432–445, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.52567/pjsr.v3i3.267.

Most read articles by the same author(s)