JUDICIAL REVIEW OF COUNTER-TERROR LEGISLATION: THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v4i04.907Abstract
Since the attacks of 9/11, terrorism has emerged as a serious concern for national security. Both the United States and Pakistan have and continue to experience the scourge of terrorism and strive to grapple with it in a manner that is compliant with their constitution. Consequently, the counter-terrorism measures put in place by both states have been put to review by the highest constitutional courts of the states. This work attempts to analyze the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme court and the Supreme Court of Pakistan and examines whether the former has impacted the interpretation of the latter.
Keywords: Judicial Review, Judiciary, Terrorism, Legislation
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Bushra Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
